Should College Athletes Be Paid?

It seems like March Madness always seems to bring up the debate on whether student athletes should be paid or not. I think that there could be a fair argument on both sides of the topic. Listed below are some reasons given from both sides.

Yes, they should be paid because:

  • The NCAA tournament requires students to miss class, it becomes more than an extracurricular activity.
  • Athletes are used in advertising and promotions ore often than not. Schools use athletes as a major part of their advertising team. 
  • They are on TV, especially teams in March Madness.
  • They bring in more money to their college or university, especially during sport contests. 
  • Football and men's basketball get as much attention as professional football and basketball. 
  • Coaches get paid but the athletes are doing most of the work. 
  • Collegiate sports take up the time they could be spending on a part time job. 
No, they should not be paid because:
  • They already receive scholarships, getting paid would be additional money on top of that. 
  • If they got paid a salary, they would have to pay taxes. 
  • It could be used on things that are not beneficial to the athletes (such as drugs and alcohol), where as scholarships go towards schooling only. 
  • Students would begin to play at the school with the largest offer, not the school of their dreams. 
  • College sports are supposed to be for passion, paying athletes would turn it into business.
  • Paying them could change their motive. Although it may feel like it, it is not your job to play a college sport, it is a choice and an extracurricular activity. 
It is easy to see both sides of the argument. Why do you think? Should collegiate athletes be paid?

ncaa sports

Comments

  1. I'd worry that if athletes got paid, they'd never want to come to class! :(

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Time Management

How To Deal With Minimal Playing Time

The Three F's